1Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
#1 Old 09-11-2012, 02:13 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 495
Ford Escape VS Mazda CX-5

Discuss and compare the Ford Escape and Mazda CX-5 here.
EscapeFan is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 Old 10-24-2012, 12:30 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 65
Autoblog did a comparison of the 2013 Ford Escape vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5 here:
2013 Ford Escape vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
rhfd is offline  
#3 Old 10-30-2012, 12:27 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 65
rhfd is offline  
#4 Old 03-06-2013, 09:54 AM
Member
 
someguyinnyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 44
I was very close to buying the CX-5 because I liked the way it drove. I'm not a huge fan of the interior.



if it wasn't for a dick salesperson I probably would have bought one.

The Escape is a nicer looking car from any angle.

Just check out the review you posted
"A lot of our discussions about the two crossovers' interiors are direct reflections of how we feel about their exterior designs. Basically, the Ford again impressed us with its more stylish cabin – "the interior feels like more design muscle was flexed in its creation," states Miersma.

But that isn't to say the CX-5 is anything even remotely bad. Miersma again: "Overall design makes the Mazda seem like a much older vehicle, too; the cabin doesn't feel 'ugly' so much as 'plain.'" We did find the CX-5's tech simple and easy to use, though far less pretty than the often-finicky MyFord Touch unit in the Escape. The Ford's larger display screen (that doesn't include a backup camera in this spec, unlike the Mazda) is a visual treat to behold, but even with the upgraded software, many of us had issues with the technology on board."

And this is something I noticed about the CX-5. Its very slow from a stop if you need to accelerate fast.

"Not only is it more powerful – offering a full 23 hp and 34 lb-ft more oomph than the Mazda – it delivers its grunt in a much more balanced manner. The CX-5 suffers from a lack of low-end power that's easy to feel under acceleration, both from a stop and at speed, and you'll have to really rev it for maximum thrust. Various instrumented testing from other publications quotes 8.9-second 0-60 times for both CUVs, but the Mazda simply feels slower off the line."


" The Escape's six-speed automatic has a tendency to hunt for gears and downshift when you really only need a bit of torque thrust to increase speed, and even then, the changes aren't always smooth."


Personally I like how it downshifts on a whim. When I accelerate i want to GO. The Mazda should be the one downshifting with its lack of torque. haha

The CX-5 does give better gas mileage and the steering is more direct feeling. The Escape is a little bit numb is drinks more fuel. I prefer the additional power in the Escape personally but I do wish the Escape had the steering in the CX-5. Mazda has great electric steering systems.



It is a tough draw. Escape is more powerful - the platinum is way nicer. Interior and exterior is more stylish. Mazda is a better drive in terms of steering.
someguyinnyc is offline  
#5 Old 03-08-2013, 06:42 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by someguyinnyc View Post
I was very close to buying the CX-5 because I liked the way it drove. I'm not a huge fan of the interior.



if it wasn't for a dick salesperson I probably would have bought one.

The Escape is a nicer looking car from any angle.

Just check out the review you posted
"A lot of our discussions about the two crossovers' interiors are direct reflections of how we feel about their exterior designs. Basically, the Ford again impressed us with its more stylish cabin – "the interior feels like more design muscle was flexed in its creation," states Miersma.

But that isn't to say the CX-5 is anything even remotely bad. Miersma again: "Overall design makes the Mazda seem like a much older vehicle, too; the cabin doesn't feel 'ugly' so much as 'plain.'" We did find the CX-5's tech simple and easy to use, though far less pretty than the often-finicky MyFord Touch unit in the Escape. The Ford's larger display screen (that doesn't include a backup camera in this spec, unlike the Mazda) is a visual treat to behold, but even with the upgraded software, many of us had issues with the technology on board."

And this is something I noticed about the CX-5. Its very slow from a stop if you need to accelerate fast.

"Not only is it more powerful – offering a full 23 hp and 34 lb-ft more oomph than the Mazda – it delivers its grunt in a much more balanced manner. The CX-5 suffers from a lack of low-end power that's easy to feel under acceleration, both from a stop and at speed, and you'll have to really rev it for maximum thrust. Various instrumented testing from other publications quotes 8.9-second 0-60 times for both CUVs, but the Mazda simply feels slower off the line."


" The Escape's six-speed automatic has a tendency to hunt for gears and downshift when you really only need a bit of torque thrust to increase speed, and even then, the changes aren't always smooth."


Personally I like how it downshifts on a whim. When I accelerate i want to GO. The Mazda should be the one downshifting with its lack of torque. haha

The CX-5 does give better gas mileage and the steering is more direct feeling. The Escape is a little bit numb is drinks more fuel. I prefer the additional power in the Escape personally but I do wish the Escape had the steering in the CX-5. Mazda has great electric steering systems.



It is a tough draw. Escape is more powerful - the platinum is way nicer. Interior and exterior is more stylish. Mazda is a better drive in terms of steering.

I have to disagree with some of your evaluations of the Escape, one it does not hunt for a gear it is either in the gear it is supposed to be or it will down shift just like any other vehicle. After 5500 miles it shifts smooth, almost unnoticed . I didn't drive the Mazada much, but after a mile it was apparent to me the lack of power was an issue, but did not find the steering any better then the Ford. The Escape IMO has it hands down over the CX5. The CX5 is not even in the same league .
Mmm3 likes this.
psford99 is offline  
#6 Old 03-11-2013, 12:34 PM
Senior Member
 
mnlauzon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 957
I test drive the CX5 and it is a nice car. I avoided it because my neighbor has owned 2 mazda vehicles and both of them have major rust damage. We go to the same rust proofing business every year. The Mazdas seem to have major rust problems.
mnlauzon is offline  
#7 Old 03-20-2013, 11:29 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 22
Talking

I too tested the new 2014 Mazda CX-5, and the underpowered 2013 model.

They are identical in all aspects, other than the larger 2.5L 184HP engine in the 2014.

The 2014 drives well I must say, the 2013 is limp. The FE drove better than both. Despite all the hoopla about zoom-zoom this, and drivers-car that, the FE has more pickup and is more FUN to drive than either CX. They may get better fuel economy (for sure the 2013, but we'll have to see about the fuel economy of the 2014...we can check out the Mazda forums to see what the new CX-5 2014 owners are saying...

The CX-5 is a good looking car, yet it reminds me of so many designs of smaller sport utes out there (Rogue, Mitsubishi Outlander Sport, the CX-7 and CX-9, Murano, Infinity EX-35, and the list goes on), its a done concept... The FE is refreshingly different in look, nothing quite like it out there...

The interior of the CX-5 is strict/serious and almost dated... the overall gadgetry is circa 2010, the Navi is literally a Tom-Tom they stuffed in there...it's integration with the rest of the electronics is no SYNC...the quality of the interior is good.

I noticed some road noise when test driving the CX-5s...The door seemed light and definitely no "clunk" when you shut them of the FE. The FE feels like you are shutting a door on an X3. This heavy sheet metal and insulation made the FE much quieter and sturdier in feel.

Lastly the Titanium package which I am interested on the FE is so much more comprehensive than the Grand Touring in the CX-5.

Wide open skyroof....enough said...

My 2 cents as I look to make my decision....

Boogaboo
boogaboo is offline  
#8 Old 03-21-2013, 12:26 PM
Senior Member
 
mnlauzon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 957
Glad to read your opinion. I do agree with you that the CX5 is just too slow for me. It isn't special like the Escape is. I have also noticed the road noise. The sheet metal seems to be thinner and the door seems to be a bit hollow.
mnlauzon is offline  
#9 Old 07-12-2013, 03:33 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 5
Escape Vs CX-5, back to front, part 1 - Cargo Space

I own a 2014 CX-5 GT and was pretty close to buying an Escape Titanium. I also recently rented a Escape SEL with 1.6 Ecoboost, Moonroof, leather seats and pretty much every option you can get in an SEL. It was missing the Sony premium audio, navigation, parking aids, and HID, but I think other than the Nav, I would have had to step up into a Titanium which I've test drove, but couldn't rent. I have had the 2014 CX-5 for 2 months now. Of course there is some buyer's remorse at work here, but there are a few things that really kill my day to day experience with the CX-5 and why I wish I had purchased the Escape. Honestly, the main reason I bought the Mazda was due to the attitude at the dealership, although I shouldn't have let that influence my decision. The bottom line is, if you are a techy person first and formost, I would recommend buying the Escape.

Instead of comparing everything at once, I will make a few posts, starting with back and working forward

Cargo space

Very similar dimensions, honestly a CUV, while better than the trunk in my Civic, doesn't give me a crazy amount of space. It was useful when I went to pick up a generator recently, but I could have put it in my trunk and tied it down if really needed in my Civic. CX-5 and Escape cargo space dimensions are very similar. Escape has a bit more with seats folded (68 vs 64 rounded), but I doubt anyone would really notice the difference. I did a mountain bike test in both and in both I could fit in 2 mountain bikes with the seats down. Bikes can either be laid down or stood up with the back week towards the back of the front seat. In the CX-5, the 40/20/40 split was nice as I was able to just put the middle down to allow the bike through. It would still allow me to seat 2 people in the back if needed. Plus the seat sides keep the bike from shifting too much. Both the CX-5 and Escape fold flat. Maybe the Escape is a bit flatter, but not by much.

Winner CX-5 for the 40/20/40 split

Liftover height, Loading stuff

The Escape is nice as the liftover height is about 2 inches lower than the CX-5. Makes it easier to load things in, plus there is a nicer rubber/plastic lip that made it feel less likely that I would scratch things up when loading them. For the CX-5 they do make a pretty cool soft cargo cover which covers the cargo bottom as well as the back of the seats. Also it has a lip that is velcroed on and can be tucked away when not in use. It almost looks like one of the bumpers you can put on for driving in the city to protect the back bumper. I bought this accessory and I aways use the lip when loading my bike. Although in the Escape, due to the lower liftover height, I probably would need too.

Escape is the winner, although CX-5 is pretty good if you have the soft cargo cover.

Tailgate

The Escape has a nice automatic tailgate. Wether you use the foot action, button on dash, or the keyfob, it is a nice feature to have at times. The CX-5 has nothing. No release in the car or on the key fob. You want to open the back, you have to push the release button on the bottom of the liftgate. Not a huge deal, but it would be nice to have it be automatic at times. They could have offered this in the GT trims.

Escape is the winner here

Hidden Storage
Underfloor storage in the CX-5 isn't that great. I've managed to shove a blanket, an emergency kit, and a small compressor down there. That's about it. The Escape gives you more cubbies, although it isn't class leading. The CX-5 floor does hinge in the middle, so for what little space if offers, it is easy to access if you have something towards the back. The Escape only hinges at the back. I did find a couple of hidden tie-down points in the CX-5. I have see the ones in the Escape, both have at least 4 tie down points.

Tie, Escape has a bit more space, but the middle fold in the CX-5 is useful. Actually I wish they both were a bit more like Hyundai, I love what they do in the Elantra GT with multiple fold points and various cubbies.

Rear Seat Folding
The CX-5 does offer release handles to fold the seats from the cargo area, but I really only find this useful for the middle seat. Most likely when you drop the seats, if you are 6", your seat will be too far back to let the back seat fold all the way, and the head rest catches the map pockets in the back of the seat, which leads me to believe they might rip off at some point. I suggest moving the seats up first, or just dropping them from the back seat, that way you can take the headrest off if necessary. Again, the soft cargo floor liner comes in handy, fold the seats and you have a large cargo area covered from front to back.

The Escape seats only fold from the back seat and they are only 60/40, but the headrests do fold forward which makes it easier to fold the backseats without touching the front seats. In the CX-5, I invariably find I have to move the front seats, necessitating an extra step.

I would say this is a tie. Escape beats CX-5 in convenience, but the CX-5 wins in flexibility

Appearance
Yes I know this is subjective, but I prefer the back of the CX-5. The height of the taillights, the spoiler, the look of the sharkfin (which protects me from the Sharknado), just makes the back look more attractive. IMHO, the Escape back has a few too many bumps, the tail lights are a bit high, and the spoiler is weak. I also don't like the whip antenna. I do like the Escape with the chrome finisher by the middle. I think the 13 SEL has it and the 14 Titanium has it. I will say, you will never mistake the Escape from the back for a luxury vehicle, the CX-5 might be from time to time, especially in white. I also put white LEDs for the license plate lights, so that adds a nice touch. I think the Escape back looks a little minivan-ish. Just is a bit flat and the plastic skid plate isn't the best looking.

I will not use this rating as it is totally subjective and I know I could get used to the Escape.

Other
Both provide 110 outlets in the back. CX-5 cargo cover is very nice. It hooks to the inside of the liftgate, so when opening and closing, the cover lifts up and then it goes back down. Just have to see it to explain, but regardless, your cargo is always covered. No remembering to pull back the cover, and it is flexible. I've found I can overload the area and still close it and it will conform to whatever is underneath. Pretty nice touch.

Cargo cover is a small win for the CX-5

That being said, I am not picking a winner yet. Cargo space is both is good. I am a single guy and I don't have a family. For taking the stuff up to the beach for the weekend, I would be happy to have either one. The CX-5 soft cargo liner, automatic cargo shade, and 40/20/40 split make it a bit better for holding my stuff (boogie board, bike, chair, suitcase, laptop bag, camera bag, inline skates, beach bag, umbrella, and a few other knickknacks. The Escape's automatic tailgate and lower liftover height makes it a bit easier to load all that stuff in there. My neighbors minivan has both the CX-5 and Escape beat in terms of storage space. Yea its a minivan, not a CUV, just saying no one should fool themselves thinking they are getting a huge amount of space with a CUV, but that said, a little extra space doesn't hurt and both function pretty well for a single weekend warrior or a young couple. Start loading in strollers, toys, luggage, etc, and both the Escape and CX-5 get real small, real quick.
iRizer is offline  
#10 Old 09-06-2013, 01:44 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 12
No memory seats or power liftgate for the CX-5..
Ecoboosted is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On